-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 95
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
array: add section for array-specific functions #180
Conversation
Maybe it's worth adding a section near |
Excellent suggestion, Aldwin! I will do so. :) |
3964aef
to
98f3856
Compare
Please have another look at this pull request, @Avaq. :) |
I see you switched to using regular brackets to remove ambiguity in nested type signatures. I'm curious about your reasoning. Other than that it looks good to me. :) |
I don't follow, I'm sorry. I did, for example, change |
Oh, whoops! I must have misread. It seems you were already using regular brackets before. I was talking about how I would write: |
I like to stay as true to the Haskell notation as possible, so I use You're happy for this pull request to be merged otherwise? |
I don't know where I got the square brackets from. I'll probably switch to using your haskellesk notation as well :). The changes look good to me by the way, feel free to merge. |
This commit also updates type signatures to use ‘Array _’ rather than ‘[_]’ to represent the type of a value which really must be an array.
Commit message: